State AI Tracker · Washington

Washington AI law: civil remedies for election synthetic media

A bounded reference to selected enacted measures and their limits, updated October 5, 2026. Provision verification dates appear separately from this analysis date.

Source status reviewed
October 5, 2026
Published analysis updated
October 5, 2026
Scope
Selected measures; statewide review incomplete

Selected laws in force

In force since 2023-07-23 · provision verified 2026-10-05

Synthetic Media in Electioneering

Chapter 360 provides civil remedies for candidates depicted in electioneering communications containing synthetic media. A prescribed disclosure is an affirmative defense. The act allocates sponsor and media liability and requires rulemaking, while excluding this section from ordinary chapter 42.17A violation enforcement.

ESSB 5152 — official public act ↗

Effective dates and implementation milestones

  1. 2023-07-23: ESSB 5152 took effect. Later implementation deadlines are separate from this date. ESSB 5152 — official public act ↗

Policy vectors

Candidate civil remedies
Injunctive relief and damages address qualifying synthetic depictions.
Disclosure defense
The statutory disclosure can provide an affirmative defense.

Analysis · October 5, 2026

Washington uses candidate civil remedies and a disclosure defense. Treating the act as an unconditional disclosure mandate would obscure that structure. The identity of the sponsor, the depiction, and the required evidentiary showing matter when assessing a communication.

Coverage still under review

Review current codification, PDC rules, 2024–2026 amendments and bill outcomes, and official court challenges. Selected current and concluded bills, agency rules, enforcement, and litigation have not been comprehensively screened. An omitted measure is not a finding that no relevant law exists.

Scope and method

This update expands the existing selected-law baseline using official legislative texts, codification, bill histories, and agency material. It distinguishes the act’s effective date from later duties and does not infer implementation from the passage of a deadline.

The analysis date is not a new verification date for every provision. Earlier dates remain where final text or date evidence was inaccessible. Only the separately identified in-force records enter the national export; proposed, future, and uncertain measures are excluded.

See the Illinois reference methodology for selection principles and the distinction between legislation and legal advice, or send a correction.