State AI Tracker · Tennessee

Tennessee AI law: candidate deepfake disclosures

A bounded reference to selected enacted measures and their limits, updated October 5, 2026. Provision verification dates appear separately from this analysis date.

Source status reviewed
October 5, 2026
Published analysis updated
October 5, 2026
Scope
Selected measures; statewide review incomplete

Selected laws in force

In force since 2026-07-01 · provision verified 2026-10-05

Election Deepfake Disclaimers

Public Chapter 625 addresses political advertisements containing deepfakes falsely depicting a candidate’s action or speech. It requires a disclaimer and provides criminal and civil consequences, with a qualified carrier exception. The official history records signature on March 26, 2026 and effect on July 1, 2026.

HB 1513 — official bill status ↗

Effective dates and implementation milestones

  1. 2026-07-01: HB 1513 took effect. Later implementation deadlines are separate from this date. HB 1513 — official bill status ↗

Policy vectors

Candidate depiction
The rule targets qualifying false candidate action or speech.
Multiple remedies
Criminal and civil consequences support the disclosure requirement.

Analysis · October 5, 2026

Tennessee’s 2026 election measure regulates a defined misleading depiction. Ordinary AI production and a qualifying candidate deepfake are different scope questions. Carrier treatment depends on the statutory conditions and should not be presented as immunity for content creators.

Coverage still under review

Review the ELVIS Act and other enacted measures, current election code, disclaimer exceptions, implementation, selected bills, and courts. Selected current and concluded bills, agency rules, enforcement, and litigation have not been comprehensively screened. An omitted measure is not a finding that no relevant law exists.

Scope and method

This update expands the existing selected-law baseline using official legislative texts, codification, bill histories, and agency material. It distinguishes the act’s effective date from later duties and does not infer implementation from the passage of a deadline.

The analysis date is not a new verification date for every provision. Earlier dates remain where final text or date evidence was inaccessible. Only the separately identified in-force records enter the national export; proposed, future, and uncertain measures are excluded.

See the Illinois reference methodology for selection principles and the distinction between legislation and legal advice, or send a correction.