State AI Tracker · New Jersey

New Jersey AI law: deepfakes connected to unlawful conduct

A bounded reference to selected enacted measures and their limits, updated October 5, 2026. Provision verification dates appear separately from this analysis date.

Source status reviewed
October 5, 2026
Published analysis updated
October 5, 2026
Scope
Selected measures; statewide review incomplete

Selected laws in force

In force since 2025-04-02 · provision verified 2026-10-05

Deceptive AI-Generated Media Protections

Chapter 40 creates criminal provisions for deepfakes used to further unlawful activity and for specified illicit-work disclosures. It also supplies civil remedies to harmed persons. It took effect immediately upon approval on April 2, 2025 and includes statutory exceptions and provider limitations.

P.L. 2025, ch. 40 — official public act ↗

Effective dates and implementation milestones

  1. 2025-04-02: P.L. 2025, ch. 40 took effect. Later implementation deadlines are separate from this date. P.L. 2025, ch. 40 — official public act ↗

Policy vectors

Conduct-based liability
Criminal provisions attach to specified unlawful uses and disclosures.
Victim remedies
Civil relief gives harmed persons an additional mechanism.

Analysis · October 5, 2026

New Jersey links criminal liability to specified conduct and mental states. The act should not be summarized as a ban on every synthetic image. Civil relief is a separate mechanism, so a criminal conviction should not be assumed to be a prerequisite to every victim remedy.

Coverage still under review

Map current codification, illicit-work exceptions and provider limitations, later bills, enforcement, and court decisions. Selected current and concluded bills, agency rules, enforcement, and litigation have not been comprehensively screened. An omitted measure is not a finding that no relevant law exists.

Scope and method

This update expands the existing selected-law baseline using official legislative texts, codification, bill histories, and agency material. It distinguishes the act’s effective date from later duties and does not infer implementation from the passage of a deadline.

The analysis date is not a new verification date for every provision. Earlier dates remain where final text or date evidence was inaccessible. Only the separately identified in-force records enter the national export; proposed, future, and uncertain measures are excluded.

See the Illinois reference methodology for selection principles and the distinction between legislation and legal advice, or send a correction.