State AI Tracker · Minnesota

Minnesota AI law: election deepfake offenses

A bounded reference to selected enacted measures and their limits, updated October 5, 2026. Provision verification dates appear separately from this analysis date.

Source status reviewed
October 5, 2026
Published analysis updated
October 5, 2026
Scope
Selected measures; statewide review incomplete

Selected laws in force

In force since 2023-08-01 · provision verified 2026-10-05

Election Candidate Deepfake Restrictions

Current section 609.771 addresses nonconsensual election deepfakes made with knowledge or reckless disregard and an intent to injure a candidate or influence an election. Its window includes the 90 days before a nominating convention or the period after absentee voting begins. Criminal and equitable remedies are distinct.

Minn. Stat. § 609.771 — current text ↗ · 2023 Minn. Laws ch. 58 — original act ↗

Effective dates and implementation milestones

  1. 2023-08-01: HF 1370 took effect. Later implementation deadlines are separate from this date. Minn. Stat. § 609.771 — current text ↗ · 2023 Minn. Laws ch. 58 — original act ↗

Policy vectors

Consent and intent
The offense turns on specified consent, knowledge, and election intent.
Election timing
Current statutory windows define the covered distribution period.

Analysis · October 5, 2026

Minnesota combines a mental-state requirement with election timing and consent. The current window should not be reduced to a generic 90 days before election day. The 2024 amendments make current codification necessary alongside the original 2023 enactment.

Coverage still under review

Map the 2024 amendment clauses, review intimate-image measures, later bills, agency action, and official litigation. Selected current and concluded bills, agency rules, enforcement, and litigation have not been comprehensively screened. An omitted measure is not a finding that no relevant law exists.

Scope and method

This update expands the existing selected-law baseline using official legislative texts, codification, bill histories, and agency material. It distinguishes the act’s effective date from later duties and does not infer implementation from the passage of a deadline.

The analysis date is not a new verification date for every provision. Earlier dates remain where final text or date evidence was inaccessible. Only the separately identified in-force records enter the national export; proposed, future, and uncertain measures are excluded.

See the Illinois reference methodology for selection principles and the distinction between legislation and legal advice, or send a correction.