State AI Tracker · Massachusetts

Massachusetts AI law: digitized sexual-image harassment

A bounded reference to selected enacted measures and their limits, updated October 5, 2026. Provision verification dates appear separately from this analysis date.

Source status reviewed
October 5, 2026
Published analysis updated
October 5, 2026
Scope
Selected measures; statewide review incomplete

Selected laws in force

In force since 2024-09-18 · provision verified 2026-09-24

Digital Intimate Imagery Protections

Chapter 118 amends criminal harassment provisions to include specified digitized nude or sexual images. Its elements include an identifiable person and qualified intent or recklessness connected to injury or distress. Consent to creation does not itself establish consent to distribution.

Chapter 118 — official public act ↗

Effective dates and implementation milestones

  1. 2024-09-18: Chapter 118 took effect. Later implementation deadlines are separate from this date. Chapter 118 — official public act ↗

Policy vectors

Artificial image coverage
Digitization extends the image-based harassment framework.
Consent and harm
Distribution, consent, mental state, and harm remain distinct elements.

Analysis · October 5, 2026

Massachusetts uses the statutory concept of digitization, which can reach artificially created images without a general AI-specific framework. Scope analysis must preserve mental-state and harm elements and the statutory exceptions. The broader technology label should not displace those requirements.

Coverage still under review

Verify current codification and general effective-date calculation, later bills, attorney general implementation, and official court decisions. Selected current and concluded bills, agency rules, enforcement, and litigation have not been comprehensively screened. An omitted measure is not a finding that no relevant law exists.

Scope and method

This update expands the existing selected-law baseline using official legislative texts, codification, bill histories, and agency material. It distinguishes the act’s effective date from later duties and does not infer implementation from the passage of a deadline.

The analysis date is not a new verification date for every provision. Earlier dates remain where final text or date evidence was inaccessible. Only the separately identified in-force records enter the national export; proposed, future, and uncertain measures are excluded.

See the Illinois reference methodology for selection principles and the distinction between legislation and legal advice, or send a correction.